Avatar

Ronald Gangnon

Professor of Biostatistics

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Biography

I am a Professor in the Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics and the Department of Population Health Sciences in the School of Medicine and Public Health at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. I have an affiliate appointment in the Department of Statistics.

I grew up in Duluth, Minnesota. I graduated from East High School in 1988. I received a BA in Mathematics and Economics in 1992 from the University of Minnesota-Duluth and an MS in Statistics in 1994 and a PhD in Statistics with emphasis in Biostatistics in 1998 from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. My PhD advisor was Murray Clayton.

I was a research scientist in the Statistical Data Analysis Center(SDAC) in the Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1998-2005. I joined the faculty with a joint appointment in the Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics and the Department of Population Health Sciences in 2005.

I am an applied biostatistician focusing on problems in clinical and epidemiologic research. Current methodologic areas of interest include (1) multi-state models for incidence, progression and regression of ocular (and other) diseases, (2) small area estimation problems, particularly ranking, (3) spatial and spatio-temporal modeling, particularly cluster detection and high-dimensional variable selection and (4) age-period-cohort modeling.

Outside of the office, I’m an avid cyclist. You can check out my recent rides on Strava. I’m also a big movie fan. You’ll definitely see me at the Wisconsin Film Festival, one of my favorite events every year, and you can see lists of my favorite films and what I’ve been watching recently on Letterboxd.

Interests

  • Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Modeling
  • Age-Period-Cohort Models
  • Ranking
  • Multi-State Models

Education

  • PhD in Statistics (emphasis in Biostatistics), 1998

    University of Wisconsin-Madison

  • MS in Statistics, 1994

    University of Wisconsin-Madison

  • BA in Mathematics and Economics, 1992

    University of Minnesota-Duluth

Publications

Spatial and spatio-temporal cluster detection via stacking

Patterns in disease across space and time are important to epidemiologists and health professionals because they may indicate underlying elevated disease risk. In some cases, elevated risk may be driven by environmental exposures, infectious diseases or other factors where timely public health interventions are important. The spatial and spatio-temporal scan statistics identify a single most likely cluster or equivalently select a single correct model. We instead consider an ensemble of single cluster models. We use stacking, a model-averaging technique, to combine relative risk estimates from all of the single cluster models into a sequence of meta-models indexed by the effective number of parameters/clusters. The number of parameters/spatiotemporal clusters is chosen using information criteria. A simulation study is conducted to demonstrate the statistical properties of the stacking method. The method is illustrated using a dataset of female breast cancer incidence data at the municipality level in Japan.

Comprehensive Planning for Healthy Eating and Active Living: A Systematic Assessment from Wisconsin

Comprehensive plans can promote healthy eating and active living (HEAL). Using a validated scorecard, we assessed HEAL-promoting components in 116 Wisconsin comprehensive plans. Few plans explicitly address healthy food access or public health. Higher HEAL scores are positively associated with population size, recent plan adoption, a consultant plan author, Democratic voting, and whether “housing and transit” is a designated local health priority. Our findings show that, in Wisconsin, municipal comprehensive plans promote HEAL in a limited and aspirational way, often without actionable policies. Strategies to improve HEAL-oriented planning practice include partnering with public health departments and additional training for planners.

Self-efficacy for cancer self-management in the context of COVID-19: a cross-sectional survey study

Purpose For cancer survivors, self-efficacy is needed to manage the disease and the effects of treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer-related healthcare, which may have impacted self-management self-efficacy. We investigated self-efficacy reported by cancer survivors during COVID-19, including associations with healthcare disruptions, distress, and general health. Methods Between 2020 and 2021, 1902 individuals aged 18–80 years with a recent cancer diagnosis completed a survey regarding the effects of COVID-19 on healthcare, self-efficacy for managing cancer and social interactions, cancer-related distress, and perceived general health. Linear and logistic models estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between self-efficacy scores, healthcare disruptions, significant distress, and general health. Results Mean self-efficacy for managing cancer was 7.58 out of 10. Greater self-efficacy was associated with lower odds for distress (OR 0.18 [95% CI 0.13–0.26], quartile 4 vs. 1) and for worse general health (0.05 [0.03–0.09]). Participants with disruptions to cancer-related healthcare had lower self-efficacy for managing cancer compared to those without (6.62 vs. 7.09, respectively, P < 0.001) and higher odds for distress (1.70 [1.36–2.14]), but not worse general health (1.13 [0.39–1.44]). Lower self-efficacy mediated 27% of the association between healthcare disruptions and increased distress (15–47%). Associations with self-efficacy for managing social interactions trended in the same direction. Conclusions During COVID-19, disruptions to cancer-related healthcare were associated with lower self-efficacy, increased distress, and worse general health. Psychosocial interventions designed to overcome barriers and target self-efficacy may be important for enhancing outcomes among cancer survivors experiencing disruptions in healthcare access.

Genotypes in the 17q12-q21 asthma risk locus and early-life viral wheezing illnesses

Walking, public transit, and transitions to non-driving among US Medicare enrollees

Background Many older adults rely on private vehicles for their mobility and may continue to drive when they are advised to stop. Walking and public transit can fulfill mobility needs in some contexts, but in the U.S. these options may not adequately substitute for driving when older adults reduce or stop driving. We examined whether baseline walking or taking public transit was associated with reductions in older adults’ driving after a three-year period in the United States. Methods We analyzed National Health and Aging Trends Study data from community-dwelling older drivers in 2015 (n = 4574). We used weighted logistic regression to estimate associations between older drivers’ walking and use of public transit in 2015 and changes in their driving behavior three years later—avoiding more driving conditions, driving less often, or not driving at all. We also examined associations between neighborhood walkability and driving behavior change three years later. Results There were no statistically significant associations between walking or taking public transit in 2015 and the adjusted odds of driving behavior change three years later. However, older drivers living in the most walkable neighborhoods in 2015 had greater adjusted odds of avoiding more driving conditions compared to those in the least walkable neighborhoods (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.66; 95 % Confidence Interval (95 % CI): 1.23-2.25). Living in the most walkable neighborhoods compared to the least walkable neighborhoods was also associated with an increased odds of no longer driving in 2018 (aOR = 1.56; 95 % CI: 1.04–2.36). Discussion The walkability of one’s neighborhood area—shorter distances between blocks, diverse land uses, and proximity to transit stops—is associated with driving behavior changes over time for older drivers. This work can inform programs and policies designed to connect older adults with alternative transportation options to driving.